Ideal Papers and Critic Awards
Yearly, the Editorial personnel selects the written documents from that year or so that contain constructed the most significant affects to way of thinking or train of chance assessment. The employees also picks reviewers who have contributed excellent critical reviews to acknowledge their exceptional labors and efforts on the diary.see The accreditations are awarded inside the SRA’s Once-a-year Achieving.
2015 Most effective Records “Operational Designs of Infrastructure Resilience,” by David L. Alderson, Gerald G. Dark brown and W. Matthew Carlyle, 35(4):562-586. “The thought of Antifragility together with its Effects for practicing Probability Analysis,” by Terje Aven, 35(3):476-483. “Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Verdict and Threat Research,” by Gilberto Montibeller and Detlof von Winterfeldt, 35(7):1230-1251. “The Results of Downtown Form on Background Fresh air Pollution and Open public Health Risk: A Case Analysis in Raleigh, North Carolina” by Theodore J. Mansfield, Daniel A. Rodriguez, Joseph Huegy and Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, 35(5):901-918 2014 Preferred Reports Effects of Bought Protection and Dosage-Dependent Probability of Health problem on Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Arie H. Havelaar and Arno Swart 34(10): 1807-1819 Uncertainty in Climate Change Modelling: Can International Susceptibility Exploration Be Of Allow? Barry Anderson, Emanuele Borgonovo, Marzio Galeotti, Roberto Roson 34(2):271-293 Attenuating First Opinions: Increasing the Approval of Anthropogenic Climate Change Advice by Showing On Ideals Anne-Marie vehicle Prooijen and Paul Sparks 34(5):929-936 Handling the Fukushima Concern Atsuyuki Suzuki 34(7):1240-1256 2013 Greatest Paperwork
The unintentional negative effects of financial risk-refuting details of panic 33(1): 80-91 – Kazuya Nakayachi Wild fire visibility study for the countrywide forests on the Pacific Northwest, United states 33(6): 1000-1020 – Alan Ager, Michelle Buonopane, Allison Reger and Indicate A. Finney Small-probability flood threat modeling for New York City 33(5): 772-788 – Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts, Ning Lin, Wouter Botzen, Kerry Emanual and Hans de Moel 2012 Finest Papers An assessment of Chance Perceptions and Other Reasons that Impression Deluge Mitigation Habits . 32(9):1481-1495-Philip Bubeck, Willem Jan Wouter Botzen, Jeroen Aerts Modeling Clever Adversaries for Terrorism Associated risk Assessment: Some Critical Issues for Adversary Units . 32(7):1117-1121-Seth Guikema Adversarial Possibility Research for Counterterrorism Modeling . 32(5):894-915-Christ M. Rios Aliaga Exploring Solid Alternatives for Local climate Adaptation in Woodland Country Treatment . 32(12):2098-2112-Tim McDaniels, Tamsin Mills, Robin Gregory, Dan Ohlson Adversarial Associated risk Assessment with Not complete Knowledge: A Level-k Methodology . 32(7):1219-1231-Casey Rothschild, Laura McLay, Seth Guikema About the Potential risk Treatment and Probability Governance for Petroleum Functions in your Barents Seas Community, 32(9):1561-1575–Terje Aven and Ortwin Renn 2011 Ideal Documents A Causal Model of Recurring Obstructive Pulmonary Health issues (COPD) Financial risk Tony Cox, 31(1):38-62. Strategic Assessment of The environmental Problems: A Contrast relating to the UK’s Stern Evaluation on the Business economics of Global Warming together with its Committee on Radioactive Throw away Leadership Simon Dietz and Alec Morton, 31(1):129-142.
Why Next to Ignore Situations Can Lessen an Individual’s Safety Response to Hurricanes Robin Dillon, Catherine Tinsley, and Matthew Cronin, 31(3):440-449. Environmental Financial risk Examination, Prediction and Evaluating Risk Estimations Label Gibbs, 31(11). The White-colored (Masculine) Outcome and Financial risk Insight: Can Equality Make a Difference? Anna Olofsson and Saman Rashid, 31(6):1016-1032. Can Environmental Insurance packages Do well Where by Other Techniques and strategies Crash? The Situation of Below the ground Hard drive Tanks Haitao Yin, Alex Pfaff, and Howard Kunreuther, 31(1):12-24. 2010 Perfect Newspapers Reviewing Evacuation vs. Shelter-in-Site Approaches From a Terrorist Nuclear Detonation Lawrence Wein and Youngsoo Choi, 30(9):1315-1327. Dealing with Invasive Species in the Presence of Endogenous Manufacturing Adjust with Skepticism C.S. Kim, Glenn D. Schaible, Jan Lewandrowski, and Utpal Vasavada, 30(2):250-260. Showing priority for Green Health Risks from the UAE Henry Willis, Jacqueline MacDonald, Regina Shih, Sandra Geschwind, Sarah Olmstead, Jianhui Hu, Aimee Curtright, Gary Cecchine, and Melinda Moore, 30(12). The User-friendly Diagnosis Theorist (IDT) Model of Depend on in Danger Managing Matthew P. White colored and Branden B. Johnson, 30 (8):1196-1209. Threat Governance for Mobil Cell phones, Strength Queues, and also other EMF Modern advances Leeka Kheifets, John Swanson, Shaiela Kandel, and Timothy Malloy, 30(10):1482-1494.
Anthropic Shadow: Viewing Assortment Problems and Human being Extinction Potential risks Milan Cirkovic, Anders Sandbert, and Nick Bostrom, 30(10):1495-1506. Contribution to Best Challenge-Joined Cardstock Set – 2010 Terrorism Chance Clever Adversary Risk Studies: A Bioterrorism Probability Treatment Model type Gregory S. Parnell, Christopher M. Smith, and Frederick I. Moxley, 30(1):32-48. Probabilistic Chance Exploration and Terrorism Threat Barry Ezell, Steve Bennett, Detlof von Winterfeldt, John Sokolowski, and Andrew Collins, 30(4) 575-589. A reaction to Parnell, Smith, and Moxley, Reasonable Adversary Threat Analysis: A Bioterrorism Risk Leadership Design Barry C. Ezell and Andrew J. Collins, 30(6):875. Reply to Note on the Editor Gregory S. Parnell and Christopher M. Smith, 30(6):876. Anxiety Reasons Conundrums with Doubt Components Roger Cooke, 30(3):330-339. Are Conundrums with Doubt Issues a hurdle to Producing Probabilistic Interpretations of Noncancer Dangers for Nasty chemicals? Deprive Goble and Dale Hattis, 30(3):340-345. Conversation of “Conundrums with Skepticism Factors” Thomas Louis, 30(3):346-348. Uncertainty Variable Conundrums: What Lessons Should We Bring? Lorenz R. Rhomberg, 30(3):349-352. A reaction to Reviewers Roger M. Cooke, 30(3):353. Rely on and Possibility Have confidence in in Possibility Operations: A Model-Primarily based Review of Empirical Homework Timothy Earle, 30(4):541-574. Trust: The Problems in Differentiating both equally Ideas in Study Michael Siegrist, 30(7):1022-1024. Distinguishing Rely upon from Assurance: Feasible Complications, Really worth the Energy Timothy Earle, 30(7):1025-1027.
2009 Greatest Reports Evaluating Very important Uncertainty Thresholds inside of a Spatial Type of Forest Insect Attack Risk Frank Koch, Denys Yemshanov, Daniel McKenney, and William Smith, 29(9). One of Exposure to Rotavirus from Low-eating Ingestion Iterated by Simulated Intermittent Friends Timothy Julian, Robert Canales, David Leckie and Alexandria Boehm, 29(5). Losing Lifestyle Triggered by the Surging newest Orleans subsequent to Hurricane Katrina: A Preliminary Analysis of the Marriage involving Flood Properties and Death Sebastiaan Jonkman, Bob Maaskant, Ezra Boyd, and Marc Lloyd Levitan, 29(5). Dealing with Social and Institutional Threats in Kid Safety Eileen Munro, 29(7). Managing the White-colored Demise: Avalanche Danger Relief for Website traffic Ways Christoph Rheinberger, Michael Brundl, and Jakob Rhyner, 29(1). 2015 Greatest Testers Roger Flage Robin Dillon-Merrill Thekdi, Shital Robyn Wilson Michael R. Greenberg (Reserve Critic) 2014 Most effective Testers John Besley Robert Budnitz Warner Northern (Guidebook Reviewer) 2013 Most effective Reviewers Terje Aven Carmen Keller Emanuele Borgonovo 2012 Finest Reviewers Craig Trumbo Wear Schaffner David Hammitt Jim Lambert Mitchell Minor 2011 Finest Testers Roger Cooke Seth Guikema 2010 Greatest Reviewers L. Robin Keller Timothy Earle Keith Florig